Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Garcia v. Martinez et al
as 2:2022cv00978
Plaintiff:
Ronnie C. Garcia
Defendant:
Ronald Martinez and Hector H. Balderas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lacy et al v. Balderas, Jr. et al
as 1:2022cv00953
Plaintiff:
Mark Lacy and Christian Medical & Dental Associations
Defendant:
Hector H. Balderas, Jr., David R Scrase, Karen Carson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lopez v. Marquez et al
as 1:2022cv00815
Petitioner:
Fernando Lopez
Respondent:
Julian Marquez and Hector H. Balderas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ramirez v. Stephenson et al
as 2:2022cv00585
Petitioner:
Alberto Jose Ramirez
Respondent:
Mr. Stephenson and Hector H. Balderas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Salas v. Martinez et al
as 1:2022cv00040
Petitioner:
Lorenzo A. Salas
Respondent:
Leon Martinez, Anthony Romero and Hector H. Balderas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anaya v. Central N.M.C.F et al
as 1:2021cv00650
Petitioner:
Arsenio R. Anaya
Respondent:
Central N.M.C.F and Hector H Balderas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Anaya v. CNMCF et al
as 1:2021cv00460
Petitioner:
Arsenio Anaya
Respondent:
CNMCF and Hector H. Balderas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thompkins v. Santistevan et al
as 2:2021cv00005
Respondent:
Hector H Balderas, Warden Dwayne Santistevan and Dwayne Santistevan
Petitioner:
Terrick L Thompkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00992
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Lucero v. Santistevan et al
as 2:2020cv00733
Respondent:
Hector H Balderas and Dwayne Santistevan
Petitioner:
Jeremy S. Lucero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
