Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Antoine Harris v. David Pearson, et al
as 13-1062
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Antoine Harris
Defendant - Appellee:
David Blake Pearson, Missouri Bar No. #45019 and Malcolm Henry Montgomery, Missouri Bar No. #27168
Harris v. Pearson et al
as 1:2012cv00185
Plaintiff:
Antoine Harris
Defendant:
David Blake Pearson and Malcolm Henry Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Montgomery v. Cullen
as 4:2010cv01625
Petitioner:
Henry Montgomery
Respondent:
Vincent S. Cullen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Montgomery v. Cullen
as 5:2010cv01625
Petitioner:
Henry Montgomery
Respondent:
Vincent S. Cullen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Clark et al v. American International Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv05380
Plaintiff:
Jaime Clark, Jaime Clark, Ashton Clark and others
Defendant:
American International Group, Inc., American International Specialty Lines Insurance Company, Gibraltar Insurance Company, Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Henry Montgomery v. A.r. Wilfley & Sons, et al.
as PAE/2:08-CV-84686
Defendant:
A.r. Wilfley & Sons
Plaintiff:
Henry Montgomery
MONTGOMERY v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2008cv84686
Plaintiff:
HENRY MONTGOMERY
Defendant:
A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, ACF INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Ronnie Clayton et al v. Ronald Fisher et al
as 2:2008cv01755
Plaintiff:
Miguel Elias, Timothy D Malczynski, James C Dodd and others
Defendant:
CMC Lease Funding III, CMC Lease Funding 2001-3, Inc., Guardian Capital XV, LLC and others
Receiver:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Petitioner:
Ranger Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Montgomery et al v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2007cv01751
Plaintiff:
Sandy Montgomery, Sandy Montgomery, Sandy Montgomery and others
Defendant:
City of Chicago, John Cannon and Unknown Chicago Police Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
