Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 99
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 20-16081
Defendant / Appellee: TOSHIBA AMERICA CONSUMER PRODUCTS, LLC, PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA, SAMSUNG SDI (MALAYSIA) SDN BHD and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Not Classified By Court: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Petitioner / Appellant: THE ESTATE OF BARBARA CALDWELL, ANTHONY GIANASCA, CAROLYN JORGENSEN and others
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 20-15704
Defendant / Appellee: TOSHIBA AMERICA CONSUMER PRODUCTS, LLC, PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA, SAMSUNG SDI (MALAYSIA) SDN BHD and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Not Classified By Court: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Petitioner / Appellant: ELEANOR LEWIS, Proposed Intervenor
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs v. Toshiba Corporation, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-15697
Petitioner / Appellant: HARRY GARAVANIAN, CHRIS SEUFERT, KERRY MURPHY and others
Defendant / Appellee: TOSHIBA AMERICA CONSUMER PRODUCTS, LLC, PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA, SAMSUNG SDI (MALAYSIA) SDN BHD and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Not Classified By Court: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Irico Group Corporation, et al
as 19-17428
Plaintiff / Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS and DIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Defendant: SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD., THOMSON CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, INC., SAMSUNG SDI BRASIL LTDA. and others
Not Classified By Court: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Defendant / Appellant: IRICO GROUP CORPORATION and IRICO DISPLAY DEVICES CO., LTD.
Government of Puerto Rico et al v. Panasonic Corporation of North America et al
as 3:2019cv01246
Defendant: Panasonic Corporation of North America, SHENZHEN SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD, LG ELECTRONICS TAIWAN TAIPEI CO., LTD. and others
Plaintiff: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and Government of Puerto Rico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation et al v. Hitachi Ltd. et al
as 1:2018cv04879
Defendant: Irico Group Corporation, Samsung SDI Co., LTD., Beijing Matsushita Color Crt Company, LTD. and others
Plaintiff: Edward Breivik, ABC Appliance, Inc., P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation and others
Special Master: Honorable Charles A. Legge
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Tech Data Corporation et al v. Hitachi, Ltd. et al
as 1:2017cv06901
Defendant: Irico Group Corporation, Samsung SDI Co., LTD., Shenzhen Seg Hitachi Color Display Devices, LTD. and others
Plaintiff: Edward Breivik, Jimmy Jahar Thule, Ramzi Yusef and others
Special Master: Honorable Charles A. Legge
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In re EDNY Cathode Ray Tube Antitrust Cases
as 1:2017mc02038
Plaintiff: ABC Appliance, Inc., Edward Breivik, CompuCom Systems Inc and others
Defendant: Beijing Matsushita Color CRT Co Ltd, Beijing Matsushita Color Crt Company, LTD., Chunghwa Picture Tubes (Malaysia) and others
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
In re EDNY Cathode Ray Tube Antitrust Cases We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv04504
Plaintiff: ABC Appliance, Inc., Edward Breivik, CompuCom Systems Inc and others
Defendant: Beijing Matsushita Color CRT Co Ltd, Beijing Matsushita Color Crt Company, LTD., Chunghwa Picture Tubes (Malaysia) and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Costco Wholesale Corporation v. Hitachi, Ltd. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00995
Plaintiff: Costco Wholesale Corporation , Christopher Donnelly, Christopher Wirth and others
Defendant: Hitachi Ltd , Hitachi Displays Ltd , Hitachi America Ltd and others
Pecial_master: Charles A. Legge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?