Cases 1 - 10 of 85
Right Choice Managed Care, et al v. Hospital Partners, Inc., et al
as 24-1664
Plaintiff:
Right Choice Managed Care, Inc., Blue Cross of California, Inc., doing business as Anthem Blue Cross, Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
Hospital Partners, Inc., Hospital Laboratory Partners, LLC, RAJ Enterprises of Central Florida, LLC, Pinnacle Laboratory Services and others
Right Choice Managed Care, et al v. Hospital Partners, Inc., et al
as 24-1659
Plaintiff:
Right Choice Managed Care, Inc., Blue Cross of California, Inc., doing business as Anthem Blue Cross, Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
Hospital Partners, Inc., Hospital Laboratory Partners, LLC, RAJ Enterprises of Central Florida, LLC, Pinnacle Laboratory Services and others
Prosser v. Anthem Health Plans of Virginia, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00386
Plaintiff:
Christopher Prosser
Defendant:
Anthem Health Plans of Virginia, Inc. - HMO Missouri, Inc., d/b/a Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield and Does 1-35
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Prosser v. National Insurance Services of America, Inc et al
as 4:2024cv00362
Defendant:
National Insurance Services of America, Inc a/k/a and d/b/a National Insurance Direct, Inc. also known as National Insurance Direct, Inc., National Insurance Direct, Inc., Aetna Health and Life Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Prosser
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Right Choice Managed Care, et al v. Labmed Services, LLC, et al
as 22-3457
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Right Choice Managed Care, Inc., Blue Cross of California, Inc., doing business as Anthem Blue Cross, Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
Hospital Partners, Inc., Hospital Laboratory Partners, LLC, RAJ Enterprises of Central Florida, LLC, Pinnacle Laboratory Services and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Labmed Services, LLC, SeroDynamics, LLC, Beau Gertz and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. et al v. Anthem Inc et al
as 2:2022cv01256
Plaintiff:
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc., Automobile Club of Southern California, Darling Ingredients Inc and others
Defendant:
Anthem Inc d/b/a ANthem Blue Cross LIfe and Health Insurance Company agent of WELLPOINT INC, Blue Cross of California, Blue Cross of Southern California and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
Right Choice Managed Care, et al v. LabMed Services, LLC, et al
as 22-2180
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Right Choice Managed Care, Inc., Blue Cross of California, Inc., doing business as Anthem Blue Cross, Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
Hospital Partners, Inc., Hospital Laboratory Partners, LLC, RAJ Enterprises of Central Florida, LLC, Pinnacle Laboratory Services and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Labmed Services, LLC, SeroDynamics, LLC, Beau Gertz and others
JetBlue Airways Corporation et al v. Anthem Inc et al
as 2:2022cv00558
Plaintiff:
JetBlue Airways Corporation, JetBlue Airways Group Health Insurance Plan, Kraft Heinz Company, The and others
Defendant:
Anthem Inc formerly doing business as WELLPOINT INC, Blue Cross of California, Blue Cross of Southern California, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Hoover et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association et al
as 2:2022cv00261
Defendant:
Highmark Inc doing business as Blueshield of Northeastern New York formerly known as HealthNow Systems, Inc. formerly known as HealthNow New York Inc, Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida Inc and others
Plaintiff:
John Hoover, Sharon Zebley, Erick Gibbs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
