Cases 1 - 10 of 319
Kristi Burnett v. Honeywell International, Inc.
as 24-1597
Plaintiff:
KRISTI BURNETT
Defendant:
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Teresa Russell v. Honeywell International, Inc.
as 24-1596
Plaintiff:
TERESA RUSSELL
Defendant:
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Leopold v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv03713
Defendant:
Genuine Parts Company doing business as NATIONAL AUTOMOTIVE PARTS ASSOCIATION also known as NAPA, Industrial Holdings Corporation, Morse TEC, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Debra Leopold
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Durham v. Honeywell International Inc.
as 3:2023cv03727
Defendant:
Honeywell International Inc. and Allied-Signal, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Thomas Durham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Gerads v. 84 Lumber Company et al
as 3:2023cv03672
Plaintiff:
James Gerads
Defendant:
84 Lumber Company, Ace Hardware Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Successor-by-Merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv15806
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Frances Denney, et al v. Amphenol Corp., et al
as 23-8022
Petitioner:
FRANCES DENNEY and ARTHUR TERHUNE
Respondent:
AMPHENOL CORP., HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., BORGWARNER, INC. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2823
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ott et al v. Honeywell International, Inc.
as 3:2023cv02648
Plaintiff:
Lisa Ott
Defendant:
Honeywell International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
