Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 69
North American Meat Institute v. Xavier Becerra, et al
as 19-56408
Defendant / Appellee: XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of California, SONIA ANGELL, Dr., Director of the California Department of Public Health, KAREN ROSS, in her official capacity as Secretary of the California Department of Food and Agriculture
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES, THE HUMANE LEAGUE, ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: NORTH AMERICAN MEAT INSTITUTE
North American Meat Institute v. Xavier Becerra et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv08569
Defendant: Xavier Becerra, Karen Ross, Susan Fanelli and others
Plaintiff: North American Meat Institute
Intervenor Defendant: Farm Sanctuary, Animal Legal Defense Fund, The Humane Society of the United States and others
Amicus Curiae: Association of California Egg Farmers, The States of Indiana, Alabama, Arkansas, Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri, Oklahoma, South Carolina and Utah
Cause Of Action: Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Center For Biological Diversity et al v. Bernhardt et al
as 4:2019cv05206
Plaintiff: The Humane Society of the United States, Sierra Club, WildEarth Guardians and others
Defendant: David Bernhardt, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Wilbur Ross and others
Cause Of Action: Administrative Procedure Act
Righetti v. The Humane Society of the United States
as 4:2018cv06562
Plaintiff: Matthew Righetti
Defendant: The Humane Society of the United States
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question
Front Range Equine Rescue et al v. Christiansen et al
as 3:2018cv06531
Defendant: Vicki Christiansen, US Forest Service, Randy Moore and others
Plaintiff: Front Range Equine Rescue, Cindy Machado, The Humane Society of the United States and others
Amicus Curiae: Modoc County Farm Bureau, Wilson Ranches, Public Lands Council and others
Intervenor Defendant: The Coalition for the Responsible Management of the Modoc National Forest
Cause Of Action: Administrative Procedure Act
Puppies 'N Love, et al v. City of Phoenix, et al
as 17-17326
Plaintiff - Appellee: PUPPIES 'N LOVE, FRANK MINEO, VICKI MINEO
Defendant - Appellant: CITY OF PHOENIX
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellant: HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES
Humane Society of The United States et al v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2017cv00117
Plaintiff: Humane Society of The United States , The Fund for Animals
Defendant: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Department of Interior, Ryan Zinke and others
Cause Of Action: Endangered Species Act
Hiroshi Horiike, et al v. The Humane Society of the US, et al
as 17-56275
Plaintiff - Appellant: HIROSHI (GENLIN) HORIIKE, WORLD DOG ALLIANCE LTD., a Hong Kong limited liability company
Defendant - Appellee: HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES, WAYNE PACELLE
State of Alaska, et al v. Ryan Zinke, et al
as 17-35618
Plaintiff - Appellee: STATE OF ALASKA, SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL, ALASKA PROFESSIONAL HUNTERS ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant - Appellee: RYAN K. ZINKE, in his official capacity as United States Secretary of the Interior, JIM KURTH, in his official capacity as Acting Director, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, MITCH ELLIS, in his official capacity as Chief of Refuges for the Alaska Region of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee: ALASKA WILDLIFE ALLIANCE, ALASKANS FOR WILDLIFE, FRIENDS OF ALASKA NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGES and others
Movant - Appellant: RONALD T. WEST, Proposed Intervenor
Hiroshi Horiike, et al v. Humane Society of the United, et al
as 17-55853
Plaintiff - Appellant: HIROSHI (GENLIN) HORIIKE, WORLD DOG ALLIANCE LTD., a Hong Kong limited liability company
Defendant - Appellee: HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES, WAYNE PACELLE, DOES, 1-10, inclusive

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?