Cases 1 - 10 of 547
HAMMOND et al v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00922
Plaintiff:
KHALIL HAMMOND, DAVID THOMPSON, ANTOINE WALKER and others
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, LAUREL HARRY, GEORGE LITTLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hammond v. Gourley et al
as 1:2023cv01754
Plaintiff:
Khalil Hammond
Defendant:
Superintendent Gourley, C.O. Zimmerman, C.O. Iagavino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAMMOND v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2023cv01151
Plaintiff:
KHALIL K. HAMMOND
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT MICHAEL ZAKEN, DEPUTY STEPHEN BUZAZ, DEPUTY MARK DIALESANDRO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hammond v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv00998
Plaintiff:
Troy Hammond
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
HAMMOND v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2023cv02039
Plaintiff:
DORIS HAMMOND
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00844
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00130
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
MURPHY v. FEASTABLES, INC.,
as 1:2023cv00132
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY HAMMOND MURPHY
Defendant:
FEASTABLES, INC., and FEASTABLES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
MURPHY v. POSH PEANUT, INC.
as 1:2023cv00129
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY HAMMOND MURPHY
Defendant:
POSH PEANUT, INC.,
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
