Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Daniel Perkins, et al v. Brad Little, et al
as 21-35966
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL PERKINS
Plaintiff:
ALBERT PETE VEENSTRA III, KENT RICHARD ELLIS, CHARLES LYNN SACOLICK and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BRAD LITTLE, As Governor of the State of Idaho, in official Capacity, IDAHO STATE BOARD OF CORRECTION MEMBERS, In their official capacities, JOSH TEWALT, Director IDOC; In his official capacity and others
Albert Veenstra, III, et al v. Brad Little, et al
as 21-35927
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALBERT PETE VEENSTRA III
Plaintiff:
KENT RICHARD ELLIS, CHARLES LYNN SACOLICK, ALLEN BRANDT and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BRAD LITTLE, As Governor of the State of Idaho, in official Capacity, IDAHO STATE BOARD OF CORRECTION MEMBERS, In their official capacities, JOSH TEWALT, Director IDOC; In his official capacity and others
Veenstra, et al. v. Little, et al.
as 1:2021cv00341
Plaintiff:
Albert Pete Veenstra, III, Kent Ellis, Charles Lynn Sacolick and others
Defendant:
Brad Little, Idaho State Board of Correction Members, Director IDOC Josh Tewalt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrew Wolf, et al v. Idaho State Board of Correctio, et al
as 17-35273
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW J.J. WOLF and R. HANS KRUGER
Defendant - Appellee:
IDAHO STATE BOARD OF CORRECTIONS, IDAHO COMMISSION FOR PARDONS & PAROLE, BILL YOUNG and others
Andrew Wolf, et al v. Idaho State Board of Corr., et al
as 17-35215
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW J.J. WOLF and R. HANS KRUGER
Defendant - Appellee:
IDAHO STATE BOARD OF CORRECTIONS, IDAHO COMMISSION FOR PARDONS & PAROLE, BILL YOUNG and others
Wolf et al v. Otter et al
as 1:2012cv00526
Plaintiff:
Andrew J.J. Wolf, R Hans Kruger and David S Begley
Defendant:
C.L. Butch Otter, Lawrence Wasden, Idaho State Board of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
