Cases 1 - 10 of 74
Cooper v. Hapag-Lloyd AG
as 3:2023cv04739
Plaintiff:
Ralph Stanley Cooper
Defendant:
Hapag-Lloyd AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMEN'S ASSOCIATION v. HAPAG LLOYD AG et al
as 2:2023cv04171
Petitioner:
INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMEN'S ASSOCIATION
Defendant:
UNITED STATES MARITIME ALLIANCE, LTD
Respondent:
HAPAG LLOYD AG and ORIENT OVERSEAS CONTAINER LINE LIMITED
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
The Fixts Group, LLL V. Ramps Logistics Colombia SAS et al
as 4:2023cv02780
Plaintiff:
The Fixts Group, LLC
Defendant:
Ramps Logistics Colombia S.A.S., Ramps Logistics, LLC, Centauro, S.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
AIG Seguros Mexico S.A. de C.V. v. Hapag Lloyd AG
as 1:2022cv08238
Plaintiff:
AIG Seguros Mexico S.A. de C.V.
Defendant:
Hapag Lloyd AG and M/V One Apus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 mc Marine Contract
Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company et al v. Apex Logistics International Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv05277
Plaintiff:
Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company, Federal Insurance Company, Indemnity Insurance Company of North America and others
Defendant:
Apex Logistics International Inc., UPS Asia Group Pte. Ltd., Topocean Consolidation Service (Los Angeles) Inc. and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Yang Ming Marine Transport Corporation, Yang Ming (America) Corporation, Ocean Network Express Pte., Ltd. ONE and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81 Damaged Goods While Being Transported (DISCONTINUED AFTER 1/27/2014)
C.H. ROBINSON INTERNATIONAL INC. v. M/V ONE APUS et al
as 2:2022cv01029
Plaintiff:
C.H. Robinson Intl. Inc. d/b/a Christal Lines and C.H. ROBINSON INTERNATIONAL INC. doing business as CHRISTAL LINES
Defendant:
M/V ONE OPUS, CHIDORI SHIP HOLDING LLC, JESSICA SHIP HOLDINGS S.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81 Damaged Goods While Being Transported
AIT WORLDWIDE LOGISTICS, INC. et al v. M/V ONE APUS in rem et al
as 2:2022cv01022
Defendant:
HMM CO. LTD., M/V ONE APUS in rem, OCEAN NETWORK EXPRESS PTE. LTD. and others
Plaintiff:
AIT WORLDWIDE LOGISTICS, INC., TOPOCEAN CONSOLIDATION SERVICE (LOS ANGELES) INC. and WORLDBRIDGE LOGISTICS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0740 DAMAGE OR INJURY CAUSED BY VESSEL
Hanesbrands Inc. et al v. EFL Container Lines, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv09858
Defendant:
Danmar Lines Ltd., EFL Container Lines, LLC, All-Ways Forwarding Int'l Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Hanesbrands Inc., Sakar International, Inc. doing business as CSI Imports, Bob's Discount Furniture, LLC and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Chidori Ship Holding LLC, Jessica Ship Holding S.A., NYK Shipmanagement PTE LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30701 Marine Cargo Loss or Damage - Liability of Water Carriers
Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company et al v. Apex Logistics International Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv08974
Plaintiff:
Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company, Federal Insurance Company, Indemnity Insurance Company of North America and others
Defendant:
Apex Logistics International Inc., UPS Asia Group Pte. Ltd., Topocean Consolidation Service (Los Angeles) Inc. and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Yang Ming Marine Transport Corporation, Yang Ming (America) Corporation, Ocean Network Express Pte. Ltd. (ONE) and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81 Damaged Goods While Being Transported
Starr Indemnity & Liability Company et al v. Trust Freight Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv09370
Plaintiff:
Starr Indemnity & Liability Company and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Trust Freight Services, Inc., All-Ways Forwarding Int'l Inc., Sea Gate Logistics, Inc. and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
HMM Co., Ltd., Orient Star Transport International Ltd., Ocean Network Express Pte. Ltd. and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Kuehne + Nagel Inc.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30701 Marine Cargo Loss or Damage - Liability of Water Carriers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
