Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv02121
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration and Nationality Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11367
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01987
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024oe01987
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
United Specialty Insurance Company v. KTC Design Group Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv07781
Plaintiff:
United Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
KTC Design Group Inc., Nirmal Singh, Hardeep Singh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Ahmed v. Brar et al
as 2:2023cv12525
Plaintiff:
Mahsen A. Ahmed
Defendant:
Hardeep Singh Brar, Ryder Truck Rental Canada, LTD, Ryder System Inc. and others
M&T Capital and Leasing Corporation v. Singh Gorwara et al
as 3:2023cv00205
Plaintiff:
M&T Capital and Leasing Corporation f/k/a People's Capital and Leasing Corp., M&T Capital and Leasing Corporation and People
Defendant:
Amarinder Singh Gorwara and Hardeep Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ramos v. 98th. Street Auto Service Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv06429
Plaintiff:
Genaro Ramos
Defendant:
98th. Street Auto Service Inc., Astoria Auto Center Inc., Astoria Auto Care, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02965
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.