Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Mollett v. Leclerc et al
as 3:2025cv00185
Plaintiff:
Leslie D. Mollett
Defendant:
Jacques Leclerc, Mary Joy Mansclud, M.D., Stephen Wiener, D.O. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clayton v. Brittain et al
as 3:2024cv01211
Defendant:
Kerri Moore, Bill Napenburg, Karen Holly and others
Plaintiff:
Steven A. Clayton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barry Jones v. Paul Noel, et al
as 22-2992
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BARRY JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. PAUL NOEL and DR. HARESH PANDYA
Terrell Marshall v. Nelson Iannuzzi, et al
as 22-1438
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERRELL MARSHALL
Defendant / Appellee:
NELSON A. IANNUZZI and HARESH PANDYA
Dittmer #175464 v. Corizon Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00077
Plaintiff:
Gordon Scott Dittmer #175464
Defendant:
Corizon Health, Inc., Keith Papendick, Timothy Kangas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Turner v. Wetzel, et al
as 21-2879
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM D. TURNER
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN E. WETZEL, Secretary of Corrections, CORRECTION CARE SOLUTION, CARL KELDIE and others
Sutton v. Noel et al
as 1:2019cv02080
Defendant:
Dr. Paul Noel, Dr. Haresh Pandya and Pennsylvania Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Sutton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warren Easley v. Brenda Tritt, et al
as 19-3298
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WARREN EASLEY
Defendant:
DR. HARESH PANDYA and KURAS
Defendant / Appellee:
BRENDA LYNN TRITT and BRIAN SHIPTOWSKI
Jones v. Noel et al
as 3:2019cv00004
Defendant:
Dr. Paul Noel and Dr. Haresh Pandya
Plaintiff:
Barry Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maurice Harper v. B. Tritt, et al
as 17-3377
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAURICE HARPER
Defendant - Appellee:
B. TRITT, Superintendant, DEPUTY SUPERNTDT. MEINTEL, CHCA STANISHEFSKI and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
