Cases 1 - 10 of 63
Roark v. Individuals of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, former and current et al
as 5:2012cv00060
Plaintiff:
Benjamin A Roark
Defendant:
Individuals of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, former and current, Eric Holder, Alberto Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Aguilar v. Hall et al
as 6:2012cv00026
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Aguilar
Respondent:
Keith Hall, Eric Holder and Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Murray v. Lappin
as 1:2012cv00093
Petitioner:
Greg Murray
Respondent:
Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Townley v. Holder et al
as 1:2012cv00026
Plaintiff:
Brent J Townley
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Harley Lappin, Charles E Samuels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gereb v. US Attorney General et al
as 3:2011cv03418
Plaintiff:
Timothy M Gereb
Defendant:
US Attorney General, Harley Lappin, G Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. United States of America et al
as 4:2011cv00064
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Davis
Defendant:
United States of America, Harley Lappin, Hector A Ledezma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. Lappin
as 7:2011cv00002
Petitioner:
John Lee Cook
Respondent:
Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Eltayib v. Cornell Companies Inc et al
as 1:2010cv00296
Plaintiff:
Abdel Eltayib
Defendant:
Cornell Companies Inc, GEO Group Inc, David Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patel v. Cornell Companies, Inc. et al Do not docket. Case has been electronically transferred out.
as 2:2010cv00370
Plaintiff:
Kamal K. Patel
Defendant:
Cornell Companies, Inc., George Killinger, Michael Zenk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mahone v. Adduci et al
as 1:2010cv00693
Plaintiff:
Michael A Mahone
Defendant:
Jon Adduci, G. Maldonado, Jr., Harrell Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
