Cases 31 - 40 of 85
He v. Green Tree Servicing, LLC, et al
as 15-2075
Plaintiff / Appellant:
QI HE
Defendant / Appellee:
GREEN TREE SERVICING, LLC, FANNIE MAE and HARMON LAW OFFICES, P.C.
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
He v. Green Tree Servicing, LLC, et al
as 15-2017
Plaintiff / Appellant:
QI HE
Defendant / Appellee:
GREEN TREE SERVICING, LLC, FANNIE MAE, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and others
He v. Green Tree Servicing, LLC, et al
as 15-2017
Plaintiff - Appellant:
QI HE
Defendant - Appellee:
GREEN TREE SERVICING, LLC, FANNIE MAE, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and others
He v. Green Tree Servicing, LLC, et al
as 15-1976
Plaintiff - Appellant:
QI HE
Defendant - Appellee:
GREEN TREE SERVICING, LLC, FANNIE MAE, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and others
He v. Green Tree Servicing, LLC, et al
as 15-1976
Plaintiff / Appellant:
QI HE
Defendant / Appellee:
GREEN TREE SERVICING, LLC, FANNIE MAE, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and others
Lippincott v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al
as 15-1936
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES B. LIPPINCOTT
Defendant / Appellee:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., CHASE HOME FINANCE, LLC, CHASE MANHATTAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION and others
Lippincott v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al
as 15-1936
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES B. LIPPINCOTT, a/k/a James Lippincott
Defendant - Appellee:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, CHASE HOME FINANCE, LLC, CHASE MANHATTAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION and others
Windham v. Harmon Law Offices P.C.
as 1:2015cv12809
Plaintiff:
Rachel A. Windham
Defendant:
Harmon Law Offices P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Harihar v. US Bank NA et al
as 1:2015cv11880
Plaintiff:
Mohan A. Harihar
Defendant:
US Bank NA, RMBS CMLTI 2006 AR-1, Commonwealth of Massaschusetts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv10357
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
