Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Robinson v. Bolingbrook Police Department et al
as 1:2023cv04146
Plaintiff:
Harold Robinson
Defendant:
Bolingbrook Police Department, Mark J. Fleszewski, Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Greenville County Detention Center
as 2:2023cv02649
Plaintiff:
Malachi Robinson
Defendant:
Greenville County Detention Center, Krystal Hannah Spencer, D. Keels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STIEBEL v. ROBINSON et al
as 6:2021cv01322
Defendant:
Harold Robinson, M D Manley, Justin Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Peter A Stiebel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
ROBINSON JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv09436
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
HAROLD ROBINSON JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STIEBEL v. ROBINSON et al
as 4:2020cv00076
Defendant:
HAROLD ROBINSON, M D MANLEY, JUSTIN JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
PETER A STIEBEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stiebel et al v. Robinson et al
as 6:2019cv03395
Defendant:
Harold Robinson, M D Manley, Grady Morgan and others
Plaintiff:
Peter A Stiebel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Curtis et al
as 6:2019cv03320
Defendant:
Darren Vaughn, Robert Curtis, Jason L Brooks and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Charles Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hartley v. Curtis et al
as 6:2019cv03319
Defendant:
Darren Vaughn, Robert Curtis, Jason L Brooks and others
Plaintiff:
Jessica Lane Hartley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv05145
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Russell Harold Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vanlandingham v. Helms et al
as 1:2019cv00500
Defendant:
The City of Abbeville, Alabama, Billy Helms, Dorothy Baker and others
Plaintiff:
Noel Vanlandingham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
