Cases 1 - 10 of 97
Chanel, Inc. v. The Individuals, Business Entities, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2024cv20242
Plaintiff:
Chanel, Inc.
Defendant:
The Individuals, Business Entities, And Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A,, sweetbluebag, wangwuyou990 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Dugas v. Hooper
as 1:2023cv00826
Plaintiff:
Harry James Dugas
Defendant:
Tim Hooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dugas v. Hooper
as 6:2023cv00826
Plaintiff:
Harry James Dugas
Defendant:
Tim Hooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Joyner v. Rockcliff Energy Management LLC et al
as 6:2023cv00248
Plaintiff:
Harry James Joyner
Defendant:
Rockcliff Energy Management LLC, Helmerich & Payne, Inc. and Helmerich & Payne International Drilling Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Kuczma v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00294
Plaintiff:
Harry James Kuczma
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Conner v. US
as 23-1316
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HARRY J. CONNER and HARRY JAMES CONNER
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
US v. Harry Bellamy, II
as 22-4550
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
HARRY JAMES BELLAMY, II, a/k/a Little
STEPHANIE v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION et al
as 3:2022cv05580
Plaintiff:
HARRIS JAMES STEPHANIE
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and CHRISTINE SADOVY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
JAMES v. BRANT et al
as 3:2022cv00106
Plaintiff:
HARRY JAMES
Defendant:
JOHN MARTIN BRANT and GREGORY ALLAN GARLOCK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Labar v. Balkan Transport, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00262
Defendant:
Michael Towndrow and Balkan Transport, LLC
Plaintiff:
Harry James Labar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
