Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Tocco et al v. Hartman and Tyner, Inc. et al
as 0:2018cv61421
Plaintiff:
Edward Tocco and George Schifino
Defendant:
Hartman and Tyner, Inc. and Heidi Hartman Wenokur
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hartman and Tyner, Inc. v. Adkins
as 0:2018cv60618
Plaintiff:
Hartman and Tyner, Inc.
Defendant:
Daniel Adkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MG Productions of South Florida, Inc. v. Hartman and Tyner, Inc.
as 0:2018cv60380
Plaintiff:
MG Productions of South Florida, Inc.
Defendant:
Hartman and Tyner, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gillis v. Hartman and Tyner, Inc.
as 0:2018cv60303
Plaintiff:
Clarence Gillis
Defendant:
Hartman and Tyner, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611
Adkins v. Hartman et al
as 0:2018cv60176
Plaintiff:
Daniel K Adkins
Defendant:
Bernard Hartman, Hartman and Tyner, Inc. and Heidi Hartman Wenokur
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crosta v. Hartman and Tyner, Inc.
as 0:2015cv60404
Plaintiff:
William Crosta
Defendant:
Hartman and Tyner, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611
Rowland v. Hartman and Tyner, Inc.
as 0:2014cv62772
Plaintiff:
Jason Christopher Rowland
Defendant:
Hartman and Tyner, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
NLRB v. Hartman and Tyner, Inc.
as 14-1228
Petitioner:
National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
Hartman and Tyner, Inc., doing business as Mardi Gras Casino and Hollywood Concessions, Inc.
Mercedes Telarroja v. Seminole Tribe of Florida, et al
as 14-13988
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MERCEDES TELARROJA
Defendant - Appellee:
SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA, UNITED COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT CORP., HOLLYWOOD MOBILE ESTATES LIMITED and others
Susan O'Leary, et al v. Seminole Tribe of Florida, et al
as 13-13503
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SUSAN O'LEARY, JODEANNE FARNHAM and MARTIN SOSNICK
Defendant - Appellee:
HOLLYWOOD MOBILE ESTATES LIMITED, LAUTREC MANAGEMENT COMPANY and HARTMAN AND TYNER, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
