Cases 11 - 20 of 34
Animashaun v. Fischer et al
as 6:2020cv06049
Plaintiff:
Damilola Animashaun
Defendant:
Fischer, Corrections Officer Riley, Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. N.Y.S. D.O.C.C.S.
as 9:2018cv01376
Defendant:
N.Y.S. D.O.C.C.S., Dayers, Upstate C.F. Investigative Officer and others
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Thomas and Bobby A. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McClinton v. Graham et al
as 9:2018cv00752
Defendant:
Lara Osika-Michales, Keonigsmann, Rachael Seguin and others
Plaintiff:
Charles D. McClinton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGriff v. Superintendent Keyser et al
as 1:2017cv07307
Plaintiff:
Dewitt McGriff
Defendant:
Superintendent Keyser, Hearing Officer Polizzi and Director of SHU Vennetozzi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanford v. Bruno et al
as 1:2017cv05132
Defendant:
Investigator D. Allen, Leslie Bruno, CDC Hearing Officer Daniel Garcia and others
Plaintiff:
Elijah Sanford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
McRae v. Fischer et al
as 9:2017cv00146
Plaintiff:
Troy McRae
Defendant:
Brian Fischer , D. Stallone , Hearing Officer Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leonardo v. Levy et al
as 1:2016cv02236
Plaintiff:
Louie Leonardo
Defendant:
Helen Levy and Adminstration Hearing Officer-HPD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bermudez v. Discipline Hearing Officer
as 1:2015cv06947
Plaintiff:
Richie Bermudez
Defendant:
Discipline Hearing Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spikes v. Superintendent et al
as 1:2014cv07144
Plaintiff:
Howard Spikes
Defendant:
Superintendent, Deputy of Security, Deputy of Programs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Copelin v. Martinez et al
as 2:2013cv05570
Plaintiff:
Cory Copelin
Defendant:
John Doe 2:13cv5570, S.P.O. C. Guadalupe-Smith, Bill Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
