Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 181
Hamlett v. Everly et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2021cv06663
Plaintiff: John Hamlett
Defendant: C.O. Taj K. Everly, C.O. Christopher J. Dillon, C.O. Gary J. Perrotta, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Lee
as 21-1805
Plaintiff / Appellant: Michael Johnson
Defendant / Appellee: H. Eigo, Correction Officer
Defendant: William Lee, Superintendent, Moore, Hearing Officer, Deputy Superintendent of Administration, Bunch, Sergeant Area Supervisor and others
Gibson v. Ingraham
as 21-1664
Plaintiff / Appellant: Bennie Gibson
Defendant / Appellee: Young, Correctional Officer, Coxsackie Correctional Facility and Ingraham, Correctional Officer, Coxsackie Correctional Facility
Defendant: Brian S. Fischer, Commissioner of New York State Department of Correctional Services, Deputy Commissioner, New York State Department of Correctional Services, ADA Perez, Warden, Downstate Correctional Facility and others
Heyliger v. Iffert
as 21-1243
Defendant: K. Vilmar, Correctional Officer; Great Meadow Correctional Facility, J. Phillips, Correctional Officer; Great Meadow Correctional Facility, Vascue, Sergeant; Great Meadow Correctional Facility and others
Defendant / Appellee: Peacock, Disciplinary Hearing Officer; Great Meadow Correctional Facility, Miller, Superintendent; Great Meadow Correctional Facility and Donald Venettozzi, Director of DOCCS Special Housing Inmate Disciplinary Program
Plaintiff / Appellant: Derek A. Heyliger
Johnson v. Tomas
as 21-271
Defendant / Appellee: N.P. K. Solotti, Lt. L. Tucker, Sgt. Royick and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Angelo D. Johnson
Defendant: Chief Medical Deputy John Morley, individually and in their officical capacities, Mr. Ranieri, Commissioner Hearing Officer and Chief Medical Deputy John Morley, individually and in their official capacities
Zappulla v. Annucci et al
as 9:2020cv01598
Defendant: Hearing Officer Kenneth Glenn, Correctional Officer Thatcher, Sergeant R. Kane and others
Plaintiff: Guy Zappulla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCluskey v. Roberts
as 20-4018
Plaintiff / Appellant: Peter McCluskey
Defendant / Appellee: Darla P. Oto, Principle Hearing Officer of the Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance, acting in her Individual Capacity and Samuel D. Roberts, New York State Commissioner Of the Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance, acting in his Individual Capacity
McCluskey v. Spitzberg
as 20-4015
Defendant / Appellee: Samuel Spitzberg, Director of Temporary and Disability Assistance, in his Individual Capacity, Frank Seminero, Supervising Hearing Officer, Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance, in his Individual Capacity, James Ryan, III, Supervising Hearing Officer, Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance, in his Individual Capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Peter McCluskey
Maione v. Zucker
as 20-3658
Defendant: Flo Mercer, Office of Administrative Hearings (OTDA), Compliance Coordinator, Adrienne Alcaro, Former Rockland Medicaid Director, Nirav Shah, Former Commissioner of the New York State Department of Health and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Tasha Ostler and Scott Maione
Defendant / Appellee: Joan Silvestri, Commissioner, Rockland County, Department of Social Services, Dr. Howard A. Zucker, Commissioner of the New York State Department of Health, Darlene Oto, Principal Hearing Officer, Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance and others
In Re: Peter McCluskey
as 20-3558
Petitioner: Peter McCluskey
Respondent: Ms. Lee, Hearing Officer, Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance, in her Individual Capacity, Frank Seminero, Supervising Hearing Officer, Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance, in his Individual Capacity, Richard Levchuck, Supervising Hearing Officer, Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance, in his Individual Capacity and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?