Cases 41 - 50 of 63
(PC)Thomas et al v. Shirley et al

as 1:2023cv00470
Plaintiff:
Ricky L. Thomas, Terrence Dunson, Michael Greene and others
Defendant:
Heather Shirley, J. Cronjager and Scott Degough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Keller v. Shirley et al

as 1:2022cv01487
Plaintiff:
Paul Stephen Keller
Defendant:
Heather Shirley, James Cronjager and Scott Degough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shawn Powell v. Heather Shirley
as 22-55787
Petitioner / Appellant:
SHAWN D. POWELL
Respondent / Appellee:
HEATHER SHIRLEY, Acting Warden
William Deauntae Shehee v. Heather Shirley

as 2:2022cv05293
Petitioner:
William Deauntae Shehee
Defendant:
Warden Heather Shirley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Aaron Deon Seymour v. Heather Shirley

as 2:2022cv04258
Petitioner:
Aaron Deon Seymour
Defendant:
Heather Shirley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Houston Michael Boji v. Heather Shirley
as 2:2022cv02410
Petitioner:
Houston Michael Boji
Respondent:
Heather Shirley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Houston Michael Boji v. Heather Shirley
as 5:2022cv00613
Petitioner:
Houston Michael Boji
Respondent:
Heather Shirley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McDaniels v. Shirley

as 3:2022cv02043
Petitioner:
Shelton T. McDaniels
Respondent:
Heather Shirley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Omar Valenzuela Perez v. Heather Shirley

as 2:2022cv01302
Petitioner:
Omar Valenzuela Perez
Respondent:
Heather Shirley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moses Clark v. Heather Shirley, et al
as 22-55188
Petitioner / Appellant:
MOSES CLARK
Respondent / Appellee:
HEATHER SHIRLEY and PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.