Cases 21 - 30 of 109
Voter Reference Foundation, LLC et al v. Balderas et al
as 1:2022cv00222
Plaintiff:
Voter Reference Foundation, LLC and Holly Steinberg
Defendant:
Hector Balderas and Maggie Toulouse Oliver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Daigle v. Mathew et al
as 1:2022cv00147
Plaintiff:
Claudia Daigle
Defendant:
Francis J. Mathew, Julie J Vargas, John P Hays and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cleveland v. Keller et al
as 1:2022cv00101
Plaintiff:
Shannon Cleveland
Defendant:
Tim Keller, Hector Balderas, Carmen Lujan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Vigil v. Martinez et al.
as 2:2022cv00026
Petitioner:
Joseph Vigil
Respondent:
Ronald Martinez and Hector Balderas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sharp v. State of New Mexico et al
as 1:2021cv01165
Plaintiff:
Donald Thomas Sharp
Defendant:
State of New Mexico, State of New Mexico Board of Finance, Governor of NM Michelle Lujan Grisham and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Balderama v. Bulman et al.
as 1:2021cv01037
Plaintiff:
Javier Balderama
Defendant:
Shannon Bulman, Mary Marlowe Sommer, Kristina Bogardus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lopez v. Horton et al
as 1:2021cv00856
Petitioner:
Fernando Lopez
Respondent:
SWV Horton and Hector Balderas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Martinez v. Martinez et al
as 2:2021cv00848
Petitioner:
Armando Martinez
Respondent:
Rick Martinez and Hector Balderas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Anaya v. Hatch et al
as 1:2021cv00834
Petitioner:
Arsenio Anaya
Respondent:
FNU Hatch and Hector Balderas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Balderas v. Rovio Entertainment Corporation
as 1:2021cv00824
Plaintiff:
Hector Balderas
Defendant:
Rovio Entertainment Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
