Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Palacios v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP et al
as 1:2022cv23628
Plaintiff:
Ana Palacios
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, Hector Romero and Wal-Mart Stores East, LP doing business as WALMART SUPER CENTER #2814
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
ROMERO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv63110
Plaintiff:
HECTOR ROMERO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROMERO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv56883
Plaintiff:
HECTOR ROMERO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROMERO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv30684
Plaintiff:
HECTOR ROMERO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rodriguez et al v. ASI Lloyds et al
as 4:2020cv03187
Plaintiff:
Ana M. Rodriguez and Hector Romero-Lopez
Defendant:
Jeffrey Ryan Mims and ASI Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Romero Esperanza v. Barr
as 19-3501
Respondent:
William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Hector Romero Esperanza, AKA Hector Romero, AKA Hector Esperanza
Sapp Stephenie v. Hector Romero-Moran
as 8:2019cv00032
Plaintiff:
Sapp Stephenie
Defendant:
Hector Romero-Moran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv09204
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Eligio Torres, Jr. v. City of Chicago, et al
as 16-3450
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELIGIO TORRES, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO, HENRY PENA, HECTOR ROMERO and others
Torres, Jr. et al v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2012cv07844
Plaintiff:
Eligio Torres, Jr. and Irene Correa
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Henry Pena, Hector Romero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
