Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Hai Le v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 13-17282
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HAI VAN LE
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Director, Arizona Dept. Corrections, HERB HAILEY, Protective Segregation Administrator at Arizona Department of Corrections, HUGH MATSON, Deputy Warden, ASPC-Florence, Browning Unit and others
Le v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2011cv00744
Plaintiff:
Hai Van Le
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections, Charles L Ryan, Herb Hailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilkinson v. Schriro et al
as 4:2009cv00331
Plaintiff:
Scott Wilkinson
Defendant:
Dora B. Schriro, Bennie H Rollins, Herb Hailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willaims v. Schriro et al
as 4:2009cv00254
Plaintiff:
Dain Willaims
Defendant:
Dora B Schriro, Bennie Rollins, Herb Hailey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Atkinson v. Schriro et al
as 4:2009cv00135
Plaintiff:
Shawn M. Atkinson
Defendant:
Dora B Schriro, Bennie H Rollins, L Bartos and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Potts v. Schriro et al
as 2:2008cv01935
Plaintiff:
Marvin L Potts
Defendant:
Dora B Schriro, Bennie H Rollins, L Bartos and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Joseph Trenton v. Dora Shriro, et al
as 08-17349
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH AMAZIAH TRENTON
Defendant - Appellee:
DORA B. SHRIRO, BENNIE H. ROLLINS, L. BARTOS and others
Barraza v. Schriro et al
as 2:2008cv01954
Plaintiff:
Brian B Barraza
Defendant:
Dora B Schriro, Bennie Rollins, Herb Hailey and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Doe v. Hailey et al
as 2:2008cv01742
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Herb Hailey and Dona Markley
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Trenton et al v. Schriro et al
as 2:2008cv01250
Plaintiff:
Joseph Amaziah Trenton
Defendant:
Dora B Schriro, Bennie Rollins, L Bartos and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
