Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. et al v. Anthem Inc et al
as 2:2022cv01256
Plaintiff:
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc., Automobile Club of Southern California, Darling Ingredients Inc and others
Defendant:
Anthem Inc d/b/a ANthem Blue Cross LIfe and Health Insurance Company agent of WELLPOINT INC, Blue Cross of California, Blue Cross of Southern California and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
JetBlue Airways Corporation et al v. Anthem Inc et al
as 2:2022cv00558
Plaintiff:
JetBlue Airways Corporation, JetBlue Airways Group Health Insurance Plan, Kraft Heinz Company, The and others
Defendant:
Anthem Inc formerly doing business as WELLPOINT INC, Blue Cross of California, Blue Cross of Southern California, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Metropolitan Transportation Authority et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 2:2022cv00265
Defendant:
Anthem Inc formerly known as WELLPOINT INC doing business as Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance Company doing business as Blue Cross of California doing business as BLUE CROSS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA doing business as Blue Cross of Northern C, Independence Health Group Inc and Independence Hospital Indemnity Plan Inc, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama and others
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Transportation Authority, New York City Transit Authority, Manhattan And Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Metropolitan Transportation Authority et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 1:2021cv09101
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Transportation Authority, New York City Transit Authority, Manhattan And Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority and others
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, PREMERA and Premera Blue Cross, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Arizona, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Houston Home Dialysis LP v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 2:2019cv01765
Defendant:
Excellus Health Plan, Inc. d/b/a Excellus BlueCross BlueShield, Anthem Health Plans Inc, National Account Service Company, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Houston Home Dialysis LP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Houston Home Dialysis LP v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 4:2019cv03791
Defendant:
Excellus Health Plan, Inc. d/b/a Excellus BlueCross BlueShield, HealthNow New York, Inc., Anthem Health Plans of Kentucky, Inc. d/b/a Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kentucky and others
Plaintiff:
Houston Home Dialysis and Houston Home Dialysis LP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Caldwell v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 2:2019cv00565
Defendant:
Caring for Montannans, Inc., BlueCross BlueShield of Mississippi, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Georgia, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew B Caldwell
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Dual Diagnosis Treatment Center, Inc. et al v. Blue Cross of California d/b/a Anthem Blue Cross et al
as 0:2016mc62086
Defendant:
Blue Cross of California d/b/a Anthem Blue Cross, Natures Path Foods, Inc. Welfare Benefit Plan, Empire HealthChoice Assurance, Inc. d/b/a Empire BlueCross BlueShield and/or Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield and others
Plaintiff:
Dual Diagnosis Treatment Center, Inc, Dual Diagnosis Treatment Center, Inc., Sovereign Health of Florida, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Richmond SA Services, Inc v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 2:2016cv00774
Plaintiff:
Richmond SA Services, Inc
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Anthem, Inc., Health Care Service Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337
Richmond SA Services, Inc v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as TXS/4:16-cv-01140
Plaintiff:
Richmond SA Services, Inc
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama , Anthem, Inc. , Health Care Service Corporation and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
