Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Mulkey et al v. Hillsdale, County of, et al
as 1:2024cv00365
Plaintiff: Debra Mulkey, Perry Mulkey, Estate of Cynthia A. Stramecky and others
Defendant: Hillsdale County, Stephenie Kyser and Julie Beeker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Duby v. Barkley et al
as 4:2023cv11864
Plaintiff: Ariane Jeanine Duby
Defendant: Todd Vernon Barkley, Hillsdale, County of, Scott B Hodshire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paul et al v. Marquette, County of et al
as 2:2023cv00121
Plaintiff: Margaret Geary, Ronald S Arnett, Mark Paul and others
Defendant: Marquette, County of, Jacqueline Soloman, Nicholas Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Custer v. Hodshire et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00549
Plaintiff: Justin Nathaniel Custer, Sr.
Defendant: Scott B. Hodshire, Unknown Liggett and Hillsdale County Jail Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wayside Church, et al v. Van Buren County, MI, et al
as 23-1471
Plaintiff / Appellee: WAYSIDE CHURCH, an Illinois Not-For-Profit (Ecclesiastical) Corporation, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, HENDERSON HODGENS, Van Buren County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, JOHN G. RIECKMAN, Alger County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated in each of the aforesaid counties and others
Defendant: VAN BUREN COUNTY, MI, in its individual Michigan municipal capacity and on behalf of a class of all other Michigan counties similarly situated
Appellant: VISSER AND ASSOCIATES, PLLC, DONALD RAY VISSER, DONOVAN VISSER and others
Defendant / Appellee: ALGER COUNTY, MI, ALLEGAN COUNTY, MI, ANTRIM COUNTY, MI and others
Wayside Church, et al v. Van Buren County, MI, et al
as 23-1339
Plaintiff / Appellee: WAYSIDE CHURCH, an Illinois Not-For-Profit (Ecclesiastical) Corporation, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, HENDERSON HODGENS, Van Buren County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, JOHN G. RIECKMAN, Alger County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated in each of the aforesaid counties and others
Intervenor: TAYLOR BEIGHTOL
Defendant / Appellee: VAN BUREN COUNTY, MI, in its individual Michigan municipal capacity and on behalf of a class of all other Michigan counties similarly situated, ALGER COUNTY, MI, ALLEGAN COUNTY, MI and others
In re: Frederick Grainger, Jr., et al
as 23-103
Petitioner: In re: FREDERICK GRAINGER, JR., BRIAN BEHOVITZ, MINDY CALKINS and others
Respondent: WAYSIDE CHURCH, an Illinois Not-For-Profit (Ecclesiastical) Corporation, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, HENDERSON HODGENS, Van Buren County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, JOHN G. RIECKMAN, Alger County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated in each of the aforesaid counties and others
Fingal et al v. Ontonagon County et al
as 2:2023cv00061
Plaintiff: Daniel Fingal, Keith Kantor, Johanna McGee and others
Defendant: Ontonagon County, Michele Smith, Alger County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Frederick Grainger, Jr. v. Ottawa County, MI, et al
as 23-1230
Plaintiff: FREDERICK GRAINGER, JR.
Intervenor: BRIAN BEHOVITZ
Defendant / Appellee: OTTAWA COUNTY, MI, by its Board of Commissioners, AMANDA PRICE, in her individual and official capacity, BRADLEY SLAGH, in his individual capacity and others
Brandon Resch v. Catholic Charities of Jackson, Lenawee, and Hillsd, et al
as 23-1037
Plaintiff / Appellant: BRANDON MARCUS RESCH
Defendant / Appellee: CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF JACKSON, LENAWEE, AND HILLSDALE COUNTIES, ARTHUR DUDLEY CAMPFIELD, HEIDI E. WASHINGTON and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?