Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 36
Timothy Holz v. Robert McFadden, et al
as 11-56193
Plaintiff - Appellant: TIMOTHY EDWARD HOLZ
Defendant - Appellee: ROBERT MCFADDEN, Regional Director, J. L. NORWOOD, FCC Warden, HODAK, Captain, SIA and others
Hodak v. NAMCO LLC
as 1:2011cv00470
Plaintiff: Joan Hodak
Defendant: NAMCO LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Scott Njos v. Norwood et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2010cv01265
Defendant: #552646-A1, #552646-RI, Adams, -- and others
Plaintiff: Scott Njos
Timothy Holz v. Robert McFadden, et al
as 10-56300
Plaintiff - Appellant: TIMOTHY EDWARD HOLZ
Defendant - Appellee: ROBERT E MCFADDEN, Regional Director, J. L. NORWOOD, FCC Warden, HODAK, Captain, SLA and others
Njos v. Norwood et al
as 3:2010cv01736
Plaintiff: Scott Njos
Defendant: Norwood, Assistant Warden Over Medical, Hodak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Denny v. Davis et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv01659
Plaintiff: Mark J. Denny
Defendant: B. (I) Davis, B. Davis, A. (I) W. Sigler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Timothy Holz v. Robert McFadden, et al
as 10-55954
Plaintiff - Appellant: TIMOTHY EDWARD HOLZ
Defendant - Appellee: ROBERT E MCFADDEN, Regional Director, J. L. NORWOOD, FCC Warden, HODAK, Captain, SLA and others
Banks v. Hodak, et al
as 10-1225
Plaintiff - Appellant: GEORGE BANKS
Defendant - Appellee: HODAK, Captain, RENE GARCIA, Warden, IPPOLITO, Doctor Asst. and others
HODAK v. JOHN CRANE, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv61314
Plaintiff: JANE P. HODAK
Defendant: JOHN CRANE, INC., OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, PITTSBURGH-CORNING CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Banks v. Hodak We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-1031
Plaintiff - Appellant: GEORGE BANKS
Defendant - Appellee: HODAK, Captain

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?