Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Banks vs Hodak et al
as 1:2010cv00015
Petitioner:
George Banks
Defendant:
Captain Hodak, Rene Garcia FCI-Englwood Warden, Doctor Ippolito and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Hodak et al
as 1:2010cv00024
Plaintiff:
George Banks
Defendant:
Hodak, Rene Garcia and Ippolito
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hodak v. Jedco Products, Inc. et al.
as 3:2009mc00013
Plaintiff:
Joan Hodak
Defendant:
Jedco Products, Inc. et al.
UAR GP Services, LLC v. Hodak et al
as 5:2009cv00123
Plaintiff:
UAR GP Services, LLC and UAR GP Services, LLC
Defendant:
Kenneth F. Hodak and Theresa M. Hodak
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Banks v. Hodak
as 1:2009cv00285
Plaintiff:
George Banks
Defendant:
Hodak
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Ken Hodak v. Madison Capital Management, LL, et al
as 08-6543
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEN HODAK
Defendant - Appellee:
MADISON CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC, MADISON INVESTMENT PARTNERS, 24 LLC, UAR GP SERVICES, LLC and others
Lorillard Tobacco Company v. Chester, Willcox & Saxbe, et al
as 08-4383
Plaintiff:
LORILLARD TOBACCO COMPANY
Defendant:
CHESTER, WILLCOX & SAXBE
Defendant - Appellant:
W.C. GENTRY, P.A., fka Gentry, Phillips & Hodak, P.A., GENTRY AND PHILLIPS, P.A. and GP (FL) FUNDING, III, LLC
Appellee:
LESTER G. FANT, III, GP (FL) FUNDING II, LLC, GALWAY II, INC. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-6142
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jones v. Davis et al
as 1:2008cv00957
Plaintiff:
Royal Gene Domingo Jones, Sr
Defendant:
Blake Davis, J. Ziegler, Hodak and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Timothy Holz v. Robert McFadden, et al
as 08-55565
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY EDWARD HOLZ
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT E. MCFADDEN, Regional Director, J. L. NORWOOD, FCC Warden, HODAK, Captain, SIA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
