Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Browning v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01289
Plaintiff:
Holly Browning
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Work v. State of Montana et al
as 2:2022cv00072
Plaintiff:
Jonathon Work and Jonathan Work
Defendant:
State of Montana and Holly Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Work v. Brown et al
as 2:2022cv00071
Petitioner:
Jonathon Work and Jonathan Work
Respondent:
Holly Brown and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. Officer Green et al
as 2:2021cv00078
Plaintiff:
Anthony Levi Hill
Defendant:
Officer Green, Officer Musson, Holly Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown et al v. Smith & Nephew , Inc.
as 1:2019cv02667
Plaintiff:
Holly Brown and David Brown
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Candy et al v. People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01549
Plaintiff:
Robert Candy , Animal Park, Care and Rescue, Inc. and Tri State Zoological Park of Western Maryland, Inc.
Defendant:
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. , Brittany Peet, Holly Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BROWN v. BALDWIN COUNTY GEORGIA
as 5:2016cv00069
Plaintiff:
HOLLIS BROWN
Defendant:
BALDWIN COUNTY GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wells v. Van Ausdol et al
as 2:2013cv00090
Plaintiff:
Gloria Wells
Defendant:
Lorraine Van Ausdol, Holly Brown, Gallatin County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rothing v. Lambert et al
as 2:2013cv00086
Plaintiff:
Peter Rothing
Defendant:
Marty Lambert , Joe Skinner , Steve White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01824
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
