Cases 1 - 10 of 270
United States of America v. Spearman
as 24-469
Defendant:
HENRY HORTON, JAYQUAN MARTIN, KISHON SHIELDS and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00836
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv09113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1225
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bright v. McIntosh et al
as 9:2023cv01105
Plaintiff:
Willie Bright
Defendant:
D. McIntosh, Earl Bell, Sweeney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Horton v. Annucci et al
as 9:2023cv00993
Plaintiff:
Anthony Horton
Defendant:
Anthony Annucci, McCarthy, Sgt. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Giordano v. Horton Point LLC et al
as 1:2023cv06940
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Dimitri Sogoloff and Horton Point LLC
Plaintiff:
Paul Giordano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
Anderson et al v. First Transit, Inc. et al
as 7:2023cv06826
Plaintiff:
Joseph Anderson, James Bellamy, Troy Blount and others
Defendant:
First Transit, Inc., Adam Moore, Junior Dawkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward v. Chemerinski et al
as 1:2023cv06410
Plaintiff:
Antoinette Ward
Defendant:
Dr. Chemerinski, Dr. Nadia Nord, Lisahia Horton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
