Cases 1 - 10 of 63
Horton v. Navajo Technical University et al
as 1:2022cv00316
Plaintiff:
John Horton
Defendant:
Navajo Technical University and Lucas B. Babycos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Mares v. The GEO Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00097
Plaintiff:
Jake Mares
Defendant:
The GEO Group, Inc., Vincent Horton, Ronald Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. State of New Mexico et al
as 2:2021cv01043
Petitioner:
Roy Brown
Respondent:
State of New Mexico and Major Horton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lopez v. Horton et al
as 1:2021cv00856
Petitioner:
Fernando Lopez
Respondent:
SWV Horton and Hector Balderas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Navarette v. Horton, et al.
as 1:2021cv00379
Respondent:
Vincent Horton and Hector Balderas
Petitioner:
Arnoldo Navarette
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Benavidez v. State of New Mexico et al
as 1:2021cv00351
Plaintiff:
Ernesto Benavidez
Defendant:
Guadalupe County Corrections, New Mexico Corrections Department, Michelle L Grisham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gallegos v. State of New Mexico et al
as 1:2021cv00345
Defendant:
Guadalupe County Corrections, Bernalillo County District Attorney's Office, Wexford Medical Department and others
Plaintiff:
Ernest J. Gallegos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Benavidez v. Guadalupe County Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv00234
Defendant:
Gudalupe County Corrections, New Mexico Corrections Department, Wexford Medical Department and others
Plaintiff:
Ernesto J. Benavidez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Salas v. Horton et al
as 1:2021cv00209
Respondent:
Hector Balderas and Vincent Horton
Petitioner:
Paul Stephen Salas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Matamoros v. Horton et al
as 1:2020cv00889
Petitioner:
Paul John Matamoros
Respondent:
Vincent Horton and Hector Balderas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
