Cases 1 - 10 of 14
John Cullen v. Jarrett Cantrell
as 22-3629
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John Patrick Cullen
Defendant:
City of Hot Springs, Hot Springs Police Department, Michelle Lawrence, Garland Co., AR Chief Prosecutor and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Jarrett Cantrell, Billy Joe Burrough, Jr., Hot Springs, AR City Director and Chris Chapmond, Hot Springs, AR Chief of Police
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv06059
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Shaw v. Hot Springs, Arkansas, City of et al
as 6:2018cv06062
Defendant:
Officer Shawn Lowrey, Officer Michael Stone, Hot Springs, Arkansas, City of and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2018cv06040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
McGuire v. Atkinson et al
as 6:2016cv06130
Plaintiff:
Don McGuire
Defendant:
Randy Atkinson and Hot Springs, The City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Samples v. Cannon et al
as 6:2016cv06099
Plaintiff:
Linda Joyce Samples
Defendant:
Josh Cannon, James Avant, Brandon Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Godbold v. Hammons et al
as 6:2016cv06073
Plaintiff:
Tyrong Godbold
Defendant:
John Hammons , Patrick Langley , Hot Springs, The City of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Hot Springs, Arkansas, City of et al
as 6:2016cv06071
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Harris
Defendant:
Hot Springs, Arkansas, City of and Shane Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maze, LLC v. Davidson et al
as 6:2016cv06029
Plaintiff:
Maze, LLC
Defendant:
Suzanne Davidson , Elaine Jones , Becca Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Broyles v. Burrough et al
as 6:2015cv06102
Plaintiff:
Bill Broyles
Defendant:
Bill Burrough and Hot Springs, Arkansas, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
