Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Denty vs. ASRC Energy Services - Houston Contracting Company, Inc.
as 4:2023cv00024
Plaintiff:
Anthony Samuel Dillard and Evan Denty
Defendant:
Andrew Irvin and ASRC Energy Services - Houston Contracting Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Houston v. State of Alaska
as 3:2023cv00113
Petitioner:
Lovie Devon Houston
Respondent:
State of Alaska
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00259
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Emerald Consulting Group, LLC et al v. Houston Casualty Company
as 3:2015cv00022
Plaintiff:
Emerald Consulting Group, LLC and Doyon Emerald Services, LLC
Defendant:
Houston Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Houston v. Bennett et al
as 3:2013cv00158
Plaintiff:
Lovie Devon Houston
Defendant:
Allie Bennett and Joshua Hooyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Houston v. McNamara et al
as 3:2013cv00136
Plaintiff:
Lovie Devon Houston
Defendant:
M. McNamara, C. Peters, Thomas Sharkey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Houston v. Spaam et al
as 3:2013cv00129
Plaintiff:
Lovie Devon Houston
Defendant:
Micheal Spaam, Kelly Janunten, Jen Mariscal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Houston v. Hooyer et al
as 3:2013cv00130
Plaintiff:
Lovie Devon Houston
Defendant:
Joshua Hooyer and Probation Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Houston v. Mariscal et al
as 3:2013cv00125
Plaintiff:
Lovie Devon Houston
Defendant:
Jen Mariscal, Tim Kold, Joshua Hooyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Houston v. Probation
as 3:2013cv00099
Petitioner:
Lovie D. Houston
Respondent:
Probation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
