Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Brodt v. County of Harford et al
as 1:2014cv00507
Plaintiff:
Ronald Howard Brodt, Sr.
Defendant:
County of Harford , Harford County District Court, Harford County Circuit Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRODT v. COUNTY OF HARFORD et al
as 1:2014cv05017
Plaintiff:
Ronald Howard Brodt, Sr.
Defendant:
COUNTY OF HARFORD, Harford County District Court, Harford County Circuit Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRODT v. COUNTY OF HARFORD et al
as 1:2013cv01756
Plaintiff:
RONALD HOWARD BRODT, SR.
Defendant:
COUNTY OF HARFORD, HARFORD COUNTY DISTRICT COURT , HARFORD COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. City of Utica et al
as 6:2012cv01587
Plaintiff:
Willie Walker
Defendant:
City of Utica, Daniel Labella, Mark Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Patterson v. Labella et al
as 6:2012cv01572
Plaintiff:
Stephen Patterson
Defendant:
Daniel Labella, Mark Williams, John Toomey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Minor v. Curley et al
as 6:2010cv01238
Plaintiff:
Dasmin L. Minor
Defendant:
Michael Curley, Howard Brodt, James Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Brodt v. De Haven et al
as 1:2009cv00641
Petitioner:
Ronald Howard Brodt, Sr.
Respondent:
E. De Haven, William O. Carr, Thomas E. Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brodt v. De Haven
as 1:2009cv00531
Petitioner:
Ronald Howard Brodt, Sr.
Respondent:
E. De Haven
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
The People of the State of Maryland v. Brodt
as 1:2009cv01900
Plaintiff:
The People of the State of Maryland
Defendant:
Ronald Howard Brodt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Brodt v. Harford County Sheriff
as 1:2007cv00459
Petitioner:
Ronald Howard Brodt, Sr.
Respondent:
Harford County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
