Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Nelson v. Bill Hood Auto Group et al
as 2:2024cv00961
Plaintiff:
Howard James Nelson
Defendant:
Bill Hood Auto Group, Jo Meeker, William K. Hood and others
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Nelson v. Bill Hood Auto Group et al
as 3:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
Howard James Nelson
Defendant:
Bill Hood Auto Group, Jo Meeker, Unknown Gaboury, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Sawyer (PS) v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2023cv02466
Plaintiff:
Howard James Sawyer
Defendant:
No Named Defendant, FBOP Employees, Ciolli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ryan v. Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv06090
Plaintiff:
Howard James Ryan
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
REED v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv21426
Plaintiff:
HOWARD JAMES REED
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
White v. U S P Pollock
as 1:2022cv06230
Plaintiff:
Howard White and Howard James White
Defendant:
Warden U S P Pollock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bey v. Bray
as 4:2022cv00933
Plaintiff:
Howard James Redmond Bey
Defendant:
Jay Bray doing business as Mr. Cooper et al
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Redmond v. Williams et al
as 4:2022cv00910
Plaintiff:
Howard James Redmond
Defendant:
Bruce Williams, Padgett Law Group and NewRez LLC dba Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv16246
Plaintiff:
HOWARD JAMES DAVIS, JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bey v. DiNello
as 4:2022cv00406
Plaintiff:
Howard James Redmond Bey
Defendant:
Alessandro P. DiNello doing business as Flagstar Bank, FSB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
