Cases 1 - 10 of 33
William Kimble, Jr. v. Gregory Swink

as 22-6437
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM KIMBLE
Defendant / Appellee:
GREGORY SWINK, HUBERT CORPENING and DAVID COTHRON
Kimble v. Swink et al

as 1:2021cv00057
Plaintiff:
William Kimble, Jr
Defendant:
David Cothron, Hubert Corpening and Gregory Swink
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arthur Oxendale v. Hubert Corpening

as 20-7052
Respondent / Appellee:
HUBERT CORPENING, Administrator
Petitioner / Appellant:
ARTHUR LEE OXENDALE
Moore v. Corpening

as 1:2019cv00276
Defendant:
Hubert Corpening
Plaintiff:
Brice C. Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crooms v. Corpening
as 5:2019hc02256
Respondent:
Hubert Corpening
Petitioner:
Devon Shamark Crooms
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CORONA v. CORPENING
as 1:2019cv00179
Respondent:
HUBERT CORPENING
Petitioner:
NICOLAS ZAVALA CORONA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Doggett v. Corpening
as 1:2019cv00140
Petitioner:
Shawn Ryan Doggett, Jr.
Respondent:
Administrator Hubert Corpening
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Eli Alvarez v. Kenneth Lassiter
as 19-6005
Defendant / Appellee:
DONNIE WATKINS, Assistant Superintendent at Marion Correctional Institution, GREGORY SWINK, RDU Program Case Manager at Marion Correctional Institution, JENNY JENKINS, Director of RDU Program at Marion Correctional Institution and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN L. MARTIN, JR., MARVIN HAKEEM JOHNSON, MALCOLM THARRINGTON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ELI ALVAREZ
Marvin Johnson v. Kenneth Lassiter
as 18-7520
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARVIN HAKEEM JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
KENNETH E. LASSITER, Director of Prisons at Dept. of Public Safety, HUBERT CORPENING, Superintendent at Marion Corr. Ins., DONNY WATKINGS, Asst. Superintendent at Marion Corr. Ins. and others
Martin v. Lassiter et al

as 1:2018cv00278
Plaintiff:
Brian L. Martin, Jr.
Defendant:
Gregory Swink, Hubert Corpening, Kennith Lassiter and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.