Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Mead v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2022cv04021
Plaintiff:
Denise L. Mead
Defendant:
Kansas, State of, Michael L Zevitz, Melissa J Zevitz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mead v. Huff et al
as 5:2021cv04092
Plaintiff:
Denise L. Mead
Defendant:
B. Kay Huff, Michael L Zevitz, Melissa J Zevitz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ayers et al. v. Ascension Health Alliance
as 6:2021cv01289
Plaintiff:
Angela Ayers, Angelica Ayers, Debra Baker and others
Defendant:
Ascension Via Christi and Ascension Health Alliance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kidwell v. Huff et al
as 5:2021cv03011
Defendant:
Johnson County Adult Detention Center and (fnu) Huff
Plaintiff:
Ronald Kidwell and Ronald Lee Kidwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brinkman (ID 65738) v. Haberer et al
as 5:2018cv03246
Defendant:
Corizon Company, Connie R. Delperdang, Deane Donley and others
Plaintiff:
Albert L. Brinkman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brinkman (ID 65738) v. Norwood et al
as 5:2018cv03136
Plaintiff:
Albert L. Brinkman
Defendant:
Joe Norwood, Kansas Department of Corrections, Douglas Burris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brinkman (ID 65738) v. Norwood et al
as 5:2018cv03009
Plaintiff:
Albert L. Brinkman
Defendant:
Joe Norwood, Kansas Department of Corrections, Douglas Burris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Huff et al v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv02320
Plaintiff:
Ashley Huff and Gregory L. Rapp
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc. and Securus Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18: 2511 Interception and Disclosure of Wire, Oral or Electronic Communications
Huff v. USA
as 2:2017cv02288
Petitioner:
Dana J. Huff
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Choate v. City of Gardner, Kansas et al
as 2:2016cv02118
Defendant:
Gardner, Kansas, City of , Robert Huff , Justin Mohney and others
Plaintiff:
Michele Choate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
