Cases 1 - 10 of 29
DRIT LP v. Glaxo Group Limited et al
as 1:2021cv00844
Defendant:
Human Genome Sciences, Inc. and Glaxo Group Limited
Plaintiff:
DRIT LP
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 1
Human Genome Sciences, Inc. v. Kappos
as 1:2012cv01509
Plaintiff:
Human Genome Sciences, Inc.
Defendant:
David J. Kappos
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 154 AIA Appeal of Patent Term Adjustment Determination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2012cv02806
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Litwin v. Human Genome Sciences Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00979
Plaintiff:
Joan Litwin
Defendant:
Human Genome Sciences Inc., H. Thomas Watkings, Argeris N. Karabelas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
David et al v. Human Genome Sciences Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00965
Plaintiff:
Roland David and Avigdor Moche
Defendant:
Human Genome Sciences Inc. , H. Thomas Watkins , Argeris N. Karabelas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Human Genome Sciences, Inc. v. Kappos
as 1:2012cv00607
Plaintiff:
Human Genome Sciences, Inc.
Defendant:
David J. Kappos
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 154 AIA Appeal of Patent Term Adjustment Determination
Barry v. Watkins et al
as 8:2012cv00161
Plaintiff:
Ron Barry
Defendant:
H. Thomas Watkins , David P. Southwell , Timothy C. Barabe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hurhula v. Watkins, et al
as 8:2012cv00119
Plaintiff:
Brian Hurhula
Defendant:
H. Thomas Watkins , Argeris N. Karabelas , Richard J. Danzig and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Forgione v. Watkins et al
as 8:2011cv03680
Plaintiff:
Edward L. Forgione, Jr.
Defendant:
H. Thomas Watkins, Argeris N. Karabelas, Richard J. Danzig and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pokoik v. Human Genome Sciences Inc. et al
as 8:2011cv03353
Plaintiff:
Davin Pokoik
Defendant:
Human Genome Sciences Inc., H. Thomas Watkins, Timothy C. Barabe and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
