Cases 11 - 20 of 71
Carney v. Petray et al
as 5:2010cv05102
Plaintiff:
Travis Randall Carney
Defendant:
Hunter Petray, Robert Holly and Benton County Sheriff's Department/Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Biesanz v. Ferguson et al
as 5:2010cv05017
Plaintiff:
Nolan Sidney Biesanz, Jr.
Defendant:
Keith - Ferguson, Hunter Petray, Huskins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huskey v. Benton County Jail et al
as 5:2009cv05176
Plaintiff:
Shawn Michael Huskey
Defendant:
Benton County Jail, Hunter Petray, Holley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pardue v. Girdner et al
as 5:2009cv05149
Plaintiff:
Stephen Pardue
Defendant:
Girdner, Holly, Hunter Petray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sakrekov v. Petray et al
as 5:2009cv05136
Plaintiff:
John Thomas Sakrekov
Defendant:
Hunter Petray, Dowdle and Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Drake v. Petray et al
as 5:2009cv05120
Plaintiff:
Shawn Daniel Drake
Defendant:
Hunter Petray, Holly, Torres and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weaver v. Holly et al
as 5:2009cv05117
Plaintiff:
Mark D Weaver
Defendant:
Holly, Hunter Petray, Benton County Detention Center Food Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vasquez-Sanchez v. Pruitt et al
as 5:2009cv05105
Plaintiff:
Marcelo Vasquez-Sanchez
Defendant:
Pruitt, Huskins, Hunter Petray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stidam v. Huskins et al
as 5:2009cv05104
Defendant:
Huskins, Hunter Petray and Morrison
Plaintiff:
Monty Lee Stidam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weaver v. Petray et al
as 5:2009cv05100
Plaintiff:
Mark D Weaver
Defendant:
Hunter Petray, John Doe, Keith Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
