Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Capatina v. Miami Correctional Facility et al
as 3:2021cv00786
Plaintiff:
Randall Lee Max Capatina
Defendant:
Miami Correctional Facility, Wexford Health, Eskenazi Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRIGGS v. WEXFORD HEALTH CARE PROVIDES et al
as 1:2021cv02338
Plaintiff:
BRIAN GRIGGS
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH CARE PROVIDES, R. SCHILLING, JOHN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AMOS v. BYRD et al
as 2:2021cv00264
Defendant:
NURSE KIMBERLY HOBSON, NURSE L. CUPP, WEXFORD CORR. SERV. and others
Plaintiff:
ROYAL AMOS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WERT v. MICHEFF et al
as 1:2021cv01756
Defendant:
PLUMMER, MICHEFF, JEREMY JONES and others
Plaintiff:
TREVOR L. WERT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HILL v. BYRD et al
as 2:2021cv00200
Defendant:
I. RANDOLPH, RICHARD BROWN, SAMUEL J. BYRD and others
Plaintiff:
ASHER HILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TORRENCE v. WEXFORD MEDICAL COMPANY et al
as 2:2021cv00135
Defendant:
FRANCO, I. RANDOLPH, DUSHAN ZATECKY and others
Plaintiff:
KEITH SHELBY TORRENCE, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Townsend v. Neal et al
as 3:2021cv00106
Defendant:
Internal Investigations, Jeremy Stone, Ron Neal and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Townsend
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOORE v. PLUMMER et al
as 1:2020cv03246
Defendant:
WEXFORD MEDICAL HEALTH CARE, I. RANDOLPH, JEREMY JONES and others
Plaintiff:
MELVIN MOORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KNIGHT v. ZATECKY et al
as 1:2020cv03032
Defendant:
CHRISTINA CONYERS, COOK, DUSHAN ZATECKY and others
Plaintiff:
KYLE D. KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TORRENCE v. WEXFORD MEDICAL COMPANY et al
as 2:2020cv00537
Defendant:
FRANCO, I. RANDOLPH, DUSHAN ZATECKY and others
Plaintiff:
KEITH SHELBY TORRENCE, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
