Cases
Harlan et al v. Scholz et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv07832
Plaintiff: Patrick Harlan and Crawford County Republican Central Committee
Defendant: Charles W. Scholz , Ernest L. Gowen , Betty J. Coffrin and others
Intervenor_defendant: David Orr
Amicu: Asian Americans Advancing Justice - Chicago , Action Now Institute , CHANGE Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Type: Civil Rights Voting
Personal PAC et al v. McGuffage et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv01043
Plaintiff: Personal PAC , Marcena W. Love and Grace Allen Newton
Defendant: William M. McGuffage , Jesse R. Smart , Harold D. Byers and others
Amicu: Illinois Campaign for Political Reform
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Duke v. Leake We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-1454
Plaintiff - Appellant: NORTH CAROLINA RIGHT TO LIFE COMMITTEE FUND FOR INDEPENDENT POLITICAL EXPENDITURES, NORTH CAROLINA STATE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE and W. RUSSELL DUKE, JR.
Plaintiff: BARBARA JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee: LARRY LEAKE, in his official capacity as the Chairperson of the North Carolina Board of Elections, LORRAINE G. SHINN, in her official capacity as a member of the North Carolina State Board of Elections, CHARLES WINFREE, in his official committee as a member of the North Carolina Board of Elections and others
Defendant: KEITH M. KAPP, J. MICHAEL BOOE, in his official capacity as Vice-Chairperson of the North Carolina Bar Administrative Committee, DAVID BENBOW, in his official capacity as a member of the North Carolina Bar Administrative Committee and others
Intervenor/Defendant - Appellee: JAMES R. ANSLEY and COMMON CAUSE NORTH CAROLINA
Amicus Supporting Appellee: DEMOCRACY NORTH CAROLINA, AMERICAN JUDGES ASSOCIATION, CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER, INCORPORATED and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?