Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03470
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv15554
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00998
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination
Imran Khan v. Michael R. Harris et al
as 2:2023cv01768
Defendant:
Michael R. Harris, Harry-O, Harry O Productions LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Imran Khan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02714
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01567
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEHMOOD et al v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2022cv00772
Plaintiff:
SADIA MEHMOOD and IMRAN KHAN
Defendant:
ANTONY BLINKEN, MERRICK B. GARLAND, RENA BITTER and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
Khan et al v. Bisma Service Center, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv05449
Defendant:
Umair Jawad, Bisma Service Center, Inc. and Mohammed Anwar Khan
Plaintiff:
Mohammed Imran Khan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Khan v. AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No 3
as 3:2021cv01367
Defendant:
AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 3 and AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No 3
Plaintiff:
Imran Khan
Not Classified By Court:
ADR Provider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Moussaoui v. Ahmed et al
as 1:2020cv03071
Defendant:
Saddiq Khan, Imran Khan and Babar Ahmed
Plaintiff:
Zacarias Moussaoui
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
