Cases 31 - 38 of 38
ANDERSON v. INC. ACANDS et al
as 2:2007cv73664
Plaintiff:
CURTIS G. ANDERSON
Defendant:
INC. ACANDS, CELOTEX CORP, INC. EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MITCHELL et al v. INC. ACANDS et al
as 2:2007cv73662
Plaintiff:
GILBERT MITCHELL and VINA S. MITCHELL
Defendant:
INC. ACANDS, CELOTEX CORPORATION, INC. EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
HUNT et al v. INC. ACANDS et al
as 2:2007cv73673
Plaintiff:
B. HUNT and LAURA JANE HUNT
Defendant:
INC. ACANDS, CELOTEX CORPORATION, INC. EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MORRISS et al v. INC. ACANDS et al
as 2:2007cv73655
Plaintiff:
GUS MORRISS and FRANKIE O. MORRISS
Defendant:
INC. ACANDS, CELOTEX CORPORATION, INC. EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BELK v. BELK et al
as 2:2007cv73665
Defendant:
CHARLES V. BELK, INC. ACANDS, CELOTEX CORP and others
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA BELK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
TATE et al v. INC ACANDS et al
as 2:2007cv73661
Plaintiff:
MAURICE TATE and BARBARA J. TATE
Defendant:
INC ACANDS, CELOTEX CORPORATION, INC. EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
LIGAMMARI et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv67973
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LIGAMMARI and ANNA LIGAMMARI
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG CORK CO., A.P. GREEN REFRACTORIES COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
RASPANTINI et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES et al
as 2:2007cv63160
Plaintiff:
GUIDO L. RASPANTINI and CELIA Z. RASPANTINI
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. CAREY-CANADA, CELOTEX CORP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
