Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Dutschmann v. 84 Lumber Company, a limited partnership et al
as 3:2024cv01153
Plaintiff:
Aubrey Dutschmann
Defendant:
84 Lumber Company, a limited partnership, Ace Hardware Corporation, Advance Stores Company Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Gerads v. 84 Lumber Company et al
as 3:2023cv03672
Plaintiff:
James Gerads
Defendant:
84 Lumber Company, Ace Hardware Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Successor-by-Merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Horton v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, et al.
as 3:2022cv00518
Plaintiff:
JULIA, Individually and as Special Administrator o HORTON and Julia Horton
Defendant:
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, Successor-by-Merger to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC., ALFA LAVAL INC., as Successor-in-Interest to THE DELAVAL SEPARATOR COMPANY, AR WILFLEY AND SONS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Williamson v. Advance Auto Parts, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv01391
Defendant:
Cameron International Corp., Industrial Holdings Corporation f/k/a Carborundum Company, Brand Insulations, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Russell Williamson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Black, et al v. Exxon Mobil Oil Corporation, et al
as 2:2017cv15876
Defendant:
Gardner Denver, Inc., Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., Grinnell LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Janet Black and Jerry Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Erik Phillips v. Pneumo Abex, LLC
as 16-1508
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIK ROSS PHILLIPS and TINA LANDERS, spouse
Plaintiff:
GINA PHILLIPS, spouse
Defendant - Appellee:
PNEUMO ABEX, LLC, a/k/a Abex Corporation, f/k/a American Brake Shoe Company, f/k/a American Brake Shoe and Foundry Company, American Brakeblok Division and REDDAWAY MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC.
Defendant:
ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, ASTENJOHNSON, INC., B E & K INC. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
