Cases 1 - 10 of 90
Smith v. Baca, et al.
as 24-7816
Defendant:
STEVE DANIELS, Substituted in for NDOC Director Doe (ECF No. 16) agent of Charles Daniels, CHARLES DANIELS, NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Caseworker: Substituted by Edward Gibson (ECF No. 16) and others
Plaintiff:
JACOB SMITH
Morris v. Long, et al.
as 24-5995
Defendant:
MELISSA MITCHELL, named as "Mitchell", WILLIAM MILLER, Lieutenant, named as "Lt. Miller", ROMEO ARANAS and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES MORRIS
Hunter v. Henley, et al.
as 24-5760
Respondent:
ISIDRO BACA, JOHN HENLEY, substituted for Isidro Baca and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Petitioner:
LEO HUNTER
Pattison v. Lombardo, et al.
as 24-478
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANTE H PATTISON
Defendant / Appellee:
JOE LOMBARDO, BRIAN SANDOVAL, STEVE SISOLAK and others
Colbert Nichols v. Isidro Baca, et al
as 21-16968
Petitioner / Appellant:
COLBERT F. NICHOLS
Respondent / Appellee:
ISIDRO BACA, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Chi Xia v. Attorney General for the State, et al
as 21-16672
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHI XIA
Respondent / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA and ISIDRO BACA, Warden
Fernando Gallegos v. Isidro Baca, et al
as 21-16612
Petitioner / Appellant:
FERNANDO GALLEGOS
Respondent / Appellee:
ISIDRO BACA, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Ronny Powe v. Isidro Baca, et al
as 21-16534
Petitioner / Appellant:
RONNY POWE
Respondent / Appellee:
ISIDRO BACA, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
David Thompson v. Isidro Baca, et al
as 21-16347
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID C. THOMPSON
Defendant / Appellee:
ISIDRO BACA, Warden, H. WICKHAM, Deputy Dir. of NDOC, COLLMAN, S C/O Mailroom Super and others
Defendant:
BRIAN SANDEVAL, ADAM LAXSULT, JAMES DZURENDA and others
Paul Recktenwald v. Isidro Baca, et al
as 21-15900
Respondent / Appellee:
ISIDRO BACA, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Petitioner / Appellant:
PAUL RECKTENWALD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
