Cases 11 - 20 of 646
Kentrell Welch v. Charles Daniels, et al
as 22-16893
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENTRELL D. WELCH
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLES DANIELS, STEVE SISOLAK, Terminated per ECF No. 15 Second Amended Complaint, AARON FORD, Terminated #7AC and others
Pattison v. Lombardo et al.
as 3:2022cv00537
Plaintiff:
Dante H. Pattison
Defendant:
Sheriff Joe Lombardo, Brian Sandoval, Steve Sisolak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Baca et al
as 3:2022cv00522
Plaintiff:
Jacob Smith
Defendant:
Isidro Baca, Director NDOC and NDOC Caseworker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Thompson v. Isidro Baca, et al
as 22-16702
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID C. THOMPSON
Defendant / Appellee:
ISIDRO BACA, Warden, BRIAN SANDEVAL, ADAM LAXSULT and others
Defendant:
JOHNS, Dr. Terminated per FAC
Charles Garner v. Isidro Baca, et al
as 22-16677
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHARLES GARNER
Respondent / Appellee:
ISIDRO BACA, Warden, ADAM PAUL LAXALT and GABRIELA NAJERA
Matthew Williams v. Isidro Baca
as 22-16598
Petitioner / Appellant:
MATTHEW WILLIAMS
Respondent / Appellee:
ISIDRO BACA, Warden
Amieva v. Ward et al
as 3:2022cv00348
Plaintiff:
Jesus Amieva
Defendant:
Brian Ward, Lisa Walsh, Isidro Baca and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richard Peters v. Raymond, et al
as 22-15763
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD W. PETERS
Defendant / Appellee:
RAYMOND, ECF No. [129] Order re MSJ, BROOKS, ECF No. [129] Order re MSJ, MILLER, Sgt.;[12] Order dismissal and others
Ronald Silva v. Isidro Baca, et al
as 22-15398
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD SILVA
Defendant / Appellee:
ISIDRO BACA, Warden and CARDELLA, C/O
Keith Warren v. S. Powers, et al
as 22-15338
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEITH A. WARREN
Defendant / Appellee:
S. POWERS, CHANDRA THOMAS, HAROLD WICKHAM and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
