Cases
Cases 41 - 48 of 48
FESER v. AU OPTRONICS CORP. et al
as 1:2007cv00424
Plaintiff: GAIL FESER
Defendant: AU OPTRONICS CORP., AU OPTRONICS CORP. AMERICA, CHI MEIOPTO ELECTRONICS CO. LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Rywelski v. AU Optronics Corp, et al
as 0:2007cv01393
Plaintiff: Christopher C Rywelski, Christopher C Rywelski, Christopher C Rywelski and others
Defendant: AU Optronics Corp, AU Optronics Corp. America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Long v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
as 3:2007cv00028
Plaintiff: Tammy Long and Tammy Long
Defendant: AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, CHI MEI Optoelectronics Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Eisler v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
as 0:2007cv60289
Plaintiff: Scott Eisler
Defendant: AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, CHI MEI Optoelectronics Co., LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0015 Antitrust Litigation
Pulasky v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
as 1:2007cv00032
Plaintiff: John Pulasky
Defendant: AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, CHI MEI Optoelectronics Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Flanagan v. AU Optronics Corp., et al
as 3:2007cv00043
Plaintiff: Donna Jeanne Flanagan
Defendant: AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp, America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Martich v. AU Optronics Corp. America et al
as 5:2007cv00015
Plaintiff: John Martich and John Martich
Defendant: AU Optronics Corp. America, CHI MEI Optoelectronics Co., LTD., CHI MEI Optoelectronics USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Juan v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
as 1:2007cv00198
Plaintiff: Jose Juan, Jose Juan, Jose Juan and others
Defendant: AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?