Cases 1 - 10 of 19
US Department of Labor, Secretary of v. MKK Holdings Inc et al
as 4:2024cv10677
Plaintiff:
Julie A. Su, Acting Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, and US Department of Labor, Secretary of
Defendant:
MKK Holdings Inc., d/b/a Blue Fish Asian Cuisine, Sung Hee Kim, an individual, Min Kyu Kim, an individual and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Kim v. Unknown Party et al
as 2:2023cv02205
Plaintiff:
Yeong Kyu Kim
Defendant:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
LEE v. DONG BANG CORPORATION et al
as 2:2023cv02087
Plaintiff:
SARAH LEE
Defendant:
DONG BANG CORPORATION, MI JA KIM, JU HE KIM and others
In-Kyu Kim v. Korean News of Chicago, Inc., et al
as 23-1109
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IN-KYU KIM
Defendant / Appellee:
KOREAN NEWS OF CHICAGO, INC., ANDREW HUH, SOOK Y. KIM and others
LEE v. DONG BANG CORPORATION et al
as 2:2022cv01336
Plaintiff:
YU JUNG LEE
Defendant:
DONG BANG CORPORATION, MI JA KIM, SANG KYU KIM and others
Kim v. Superior Cafe Corp. et al
as 1:2021cv03620
Defendant:
Laji "Doe", Jammut "Doe", Superior Cafe Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Chul Kyu Kim
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hong v. Mommy's Jamaican Market Corp. et al
as 1:2020cv09612
Defendant:
Dae Kyu Kim, MOMMY'S JAMAICAN MARKET CORP., Myong Su Kim and others
Plaintiff:
Sun Yeul Hong
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 021
Keaton et al. v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv12326
Plaintiff:
KAREN KEATON, Magali Colon, Josephine Kopik and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
Chua v. SW & JIN Cleaners Corp. et al
as 1:2018cv06115
Defendant:
SW & JIN CLEANERS CORP., Sung Jin Kim and DO KYU KIM
Plaintiff:
confesor c chua and Confesor C. Chua
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 3:2017cv05643
Plaintiff:
Kyong Ok Yu and Un Nam Yu
Defendant:
Five Boars, LLC, Eun Kyu Kim and Chu Hwang Kim
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
