Cases 1 - 10 of 85
United States of America et al v. Lakeshore Railcar & Tanker Services LLC
as 2:2023cv00428
Plaintiff:
United States of America and Indiana State of
Defendant:
Lakeshore Railcar & Tanker Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Clean Water Act
Indiana, State of et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2023cv00106
Plaintiff:
Indiana, State of, North Dakota, State of, Alaska, State of and others
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Troy A. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Arizona, State of et al v. Michael D Lansky LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00233
Plaintiff:
Arizona, State of, Alabama, State of, Arkansas, State of and others
Defendant:
Michael D Lansky LLC an Arizona limited liability company doing business as Avid Telecom, Michael D Lansky individually as a Member/Manager/Chief Executive Officer of Michael D Lansky LLC doing business as Avid Telecom and Stacy S Reeves individually as a Manager/Vice President of Michael D Lansky LLC doing business as Avid Telecom
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
West Virginia, State of et al v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 3:2023cv00032
Plaintiff:
West Virginia, State of, North Dakota, State of, Georgia, State of and others
Defendant:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Michael S. Regan, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Chickaloon Village Traditional Council, Rappahannock Tribe, Tohono O'Odham Nation and others
Intervenor:
American Farm Bureau Federation, American Petroleum Institute, American Road and Transportation Builders Association and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Firearms Regulatory Accountability Coalition, Inc. et al v. Garland et al
as 1:2023cv00024
Plaintiff:
Firearms Regulatory Accountability Coalition, Inc., West Virginia, State of, North Dakota, State of and others
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, The and Steven Dettelbach
Petitioner:
Members of Congress
Amicus Curiae:
Robert M. Miller, Ph.D.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
United States America et al v. Flexsteel Industries Inc
as 3:2022cv00893
Plaintiff:
United States America and Indiana State of
Defendant:
Flexsteel Industries Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
STATEWIDE ORGANIZING FOR COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT et al v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY et al
as 1:2022cv02562
Plaintiff:
STATEWIDE ORGANIZING FOR COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT, HOOSIER ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL, INDIANA STATE CONFERENCE AND LAPORTE COUNTY BRANCH OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and MICHAEL S. REGAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Resource & Recovery Act
Morehouse Enterprises, LLC et al v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives et al
as 3:2022cv00116
Plaintiff:
Morehouse Enterprises, LLC doing business as Bridge City Ordnance, Eliezer Jimenez, Gun Owners of America, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, United States Department of Justice, Gary M. Restaino and others
Petitioner:
Prosecutors Against Gun Violence
Amicus Curiae:
Gun Owners for Safety, Jason Perry, Jonathan Gold and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Indiana State of v. Biden et al
as 1:2022cv00192
Plaintiff:
State of Indiana and Indiana State of
Defendant:
Joe R Biden, Department of Homeland Security, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
United Stats of America et al v. Northern Indiana Public Service Company LLC
as 2:2022cv00048
Plaintiff:
The United States, STATE OF INDIANA, United States of America and others
Defendant:
Northern Indiana Public Service Company LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
