Cases 11 - 20 of 51
WILSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2019cv00590
Defendant:
INDIANA COURT OF APPEAL, INDIANA SUPREME COURT, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2019cv03282
Defendant:
INDIANA COURT OF APPEAL, INDIANA SUPREME COURT, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IMO 2019 Attorney Mass Suspension
as 2:2019mc00090
In Re:
Danuta B. Panich, Kenneth L. Sales, Scott J. Lennox and others
WILSON v. INDIANA SUPREME COURT, COURT OF APPEALS et al
as 2:2019cv00329
Defendant:
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS and INDIANA SUPREME COURT, COURT OF APPEALS
Plaintiff:
JAMES WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOULTINGHOUSE v. VANDERBURGH CIRCUIT COURT et al
as 3:2019cv00097
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER BOULTINGHOUSE
Respondent:
VANDERBURGH CIRCUIT COURT, INDIANA SUPREME COURT and DARRYL CHAMBERLAIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HIPPENSTEEL v. INDIANA SUPREME COURT et al
as 3:2018cv00185
Defendant:
INDIANA STATE POLICE, VANDERBURGH COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, SARAH BRINKLEY and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID HIPPENSTEEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IMO 2018 Attorney Mass Suspension
as 1:2018mc00026
In Re:
Lauren Kathleen Griffin, Michael John Bellich, Thomas William Belleperche and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
SWEENEY v. INDIANA SUPREME COURT JUDGES
as 2:2018cv00194
Defendant:
INDIANA SUPREME COURT JUDGES
Plaintiff:
CHARLES SWEENEY
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-1497
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-3596
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
