Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Direct Purchaser Class Plainti, et al v. NEC Corporation, et al
as 12-15295
:
In re: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DIRECT PURCHASER CLASS PLAINTIFFS and JACO ELECTRONICS, INC.
Objector - Appellant:
MICHAEL J. RINIS, President, Rinis Travel, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
NEC CORPORATION, NEC LCD TECHNOLOGIES, LTD., RENESAS ELECTRONICS AMERICA INC. and others
Direct Purchaser Class Plainti, et al v. NEC Corporation, et al
as 12-15300
Defendant / Appellee:
SAMSUNG SDI AMERICA, INC., MITSUI & CO. (TAIWAN), LTD., NEXGEN MEDIA TECH USA, INC. and others
Not Classified By Court:
In re: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JACO ELECTRONICS, INC. and DIRECT PURCHASER CLASS PLAINTIFFS
Appellant:
BARRY HIMMELSTEIN
Direct Purchaser Class Plainti, et al v. NEC Corporation, et al
as 12-15295
Defendant / Appellee:
SAMSUNG SDI AMERICA, INC., MITSUI & CO. (TAIWAN), LTD., NEXGEN MEDIA TECH USA, INC. and others
Not Classified By Court:
In re: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Appellant:
MICHAEL J. RINIS, President, Rinis Travel, Inc.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JACO ELECTRONICS, INC. and DIRECT PURCHASER CLASS PLAINTIFFS
Direct Purchaser Class Plainti, et al v. NEC Corporation, et al
as 12-15300
:
In re: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DIRECT PURCHASER CLASS PLAINTIFFS and JACO ELECTRONICS, INC.
Objector - Appellant:
BARRY HIMMELSTEIN
Defendant - Appellee:
NEC CORPORATION, NEC LCD TECHNOLOGIES, LTD., RENESAS ELECTRONICS AMERICA INC. and others
Viewsonic Corporation v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv00335
Plaintiff:
Viewsonic Corporation
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, Inc., Chi Mei Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co Ltd v. Chimei Innolux Corporation et al
as 8:2012cv00021
Defendant:
Acer America Corporation, Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA Inc, Chimei Innolux Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co Ltd
State of Oklahoma v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 3:2011cv06686
Plaintiff:
State of Oklahoma
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, Inc., Chi Mei Innolux Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Mondis Technology Ltd v. Chimei InnoLux Corporation et al
as 2:2011cv00378
Plaintiff:
Mondis Technology Ltd
Defendant:
Chimei InnoLux Corporation and Innolux Corp.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
LG Display Company, Limited, et al v. Lisa Madigan
as 11-8017
Petitioner:
LG DISPLAY COMPANY, LIMITED, CHIMEI INNOLUX CORPORATION, formerly known as CHI EMI OPTOELECTRONICS CORPORATION, EPSON IMAGING DEVICES CORPORATION and others
Respondent:
LISA MADIGAN, Attorney General of the State of Illinois
T-Mobile U.S.A., Inc. v AU Optronics Corporation, et al
as 3:2011cv02591
Plaintiff:
T-Mobile USA Inc
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America Inc, Chi Mei Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
