Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Stuart Davila v. Innovative Emergency Manaaagement Inc
as 3:2025cv01087
Plaintiff:
Roselynn Stuart Davila
Defendant:
Innovative Emergency Management Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Stuart-Davila v. Innovative Emergency Management Inc
as 3:2025cv01088
Defendant:
Innovative Emergency Management Inc
Plaintiff:
Roselynn Stuart-Davila
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Machado et al v. Klap6 Technologies LLC et al
as 3:2024cv01655
Defendant:
Innovative Emergency Management, Inc., Klap6 Technologies LLC, Does 1 through 50 and others
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Machado and Nadia Scurry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 nr Diversity-Notice of Removal
TURNER v. IEM INTERNATIONAL, INC.
as 1:2024cv02352
Defendant:
IEM INTERNATIONAL, INC. and INNOVATIVE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT, INC.
Plaintiff:
ALYSSA TURNER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216 Fair Labor Standards Act
Innovative Emergency Management, Inc. v. ABML, LLC.
as 0:2022cv62177
Plaintiff:
INNOVATIVE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT, INC.
Defendant:
ABML, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Bache v. Special Counsel, Inc. et al
as 5:2020cv02585
Plaintiff:
Daniel R Bache and Daniel Bache
Defendant:
Special Counsel, Inc. and Innovative Emergency Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Richardson v. Innovative Emergency Management, Inc.
as 6:2020cv01353
Plaintiff:
Vincent Richardson
Defendant:
Innovative Emergency Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
West v. Innovative Emergency Management, Inc.
as 3:2014cv00359
Plaintiff:
Dinesheia West , Dorothy Jones , Myra Leonard and others
Defendant:
Innovative Emergency Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
West v. Innovative Emergency Management, Inc.
as 1:2014cv04014
Plaintiff:
Dinesheia West
Defendant:
Innovative Emergency Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
